AAFC researcher solves milk production mystery with sows

Mar 20, 2018

Back fat thickness on sows linked to mammary gland development

By Kaitlynn Anderson
Staff Reporter
Farms.com

Swine producers could improve piglet growth rates in their operations, thanks to new research from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC).

Today, many producers breed animals that give birth to large litters. Sometimes, sows have more piglets than they have teats, according to an article in AAFC’s March newsletter.

“When this happens, sows can't make enough milk to ensure that all of their piglets grow properly,” the article stated.

However, Dr. Chantal Farmer, an AAFC research scientist in Sherbrooke, Que., discovered a method that can help swine producers determine if their sows are producing the optimal amount of milk.

The solution? Measuring back fat.

Near the end of their pregnancies, gilts with back fat that is too thick or too thin could have under-developed mammary glands, the article stated. Animals in this situation may not produce sufficient amounts of milk for their litters.

The optimal range for fat thickness varies by breed. For example, the back fat on Yorkshire and Landrace crosses should be between 17 mm and 26 mm thick during the late stages of their pregnancies, according to the article.

Producers can measure sows' backfat thickness "via ultrasound, which is a very easy and straightforward measure," Dr. Farmer told Farms.com today.

Producers can find more information on Dr. Farmer’s research in The Gestating and Lactating Sow.

Jevtic/iStock/Getty Images Plus photo

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.