Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

Controlling pre-harvest Palmer amaranth and waterhemp

Controlling pre-harvest Palmer amaranth and waterhemp

Researchers are testing different methods since herbicides are not an option

By Diego Flammini
Staff Writer
Farms.com

University researchers are looking into how to control weeds prior to soybean harvest.

Prashant Jha, an Iowa State University professor and extension weed specialist, is part of a team studying mechanical options to control Palmer amaranth and waterhemp in soybean fields.

“At this time of year, herbicide applications would be off-label,” he told Farms.com.

Dicamba, for example, cannot be applied after June 30 or up to R1, whichever comes first, the Environmental Protection Agency announced in October 2020.

“We’re looking at other options for farmers and identifying how effective they are,” Jha said.

Jha and his team have been working with three technologies over the last few years.

One is a seed destructor from Redekop Manufacturing out of Saskatchewan, Canada.

The unit can be fully integrated into modern John Deere systems.

Jha’s team used it on a John Deere S680 combine on about 500 acres of soybeans last year and will repeat the tests this year.

The straw still gets distributed out of the back of the combine, while the chaff, which contains most of the weed seeds, is directed into the seed destructor unit.

The unit contains two powerful mills which destroys the seeds.

“It killed about 95 percent of the waterhemp and Palmer amaranth seeds that went through it,” Jha said. “That’s a great result.”

Another system Jha’s team is testing is chaff lining.

The team brought in a chaff lining kit from Westoz Boilermaking Service out of Australia in 2019.

The kit comes with an internal baffle system which gets installed inside the heater and a chaff lining chute. The chute captures the chaff as it exits the rear of the header while still spreading the straw.

“All the chaff and weed seeds are coming through the chute and then we are making a narrow windrow,” Jha said.

“We were reducing the spread of weed seeds by almost 98 percent,” Jha said. “All the seeds were concentrated in that narrow windrow.”

The third way Jha’s team is controlling weed seeds is burning them.

The team will burn some of the weed seeds left in the windrows once and other windrows twice to see the difference in efficacy.

The results Jha’s team have collected are preliminary.

But he wouldn’t be surprised if more farmers adopt these kinds of technologies in the future.

“When you look at the seed destructor, some of the seeds are 1mm in diameter and it’s able to break the seeds,” Jha said. “I think as more data becomes available about these technologies, farmers might look into them as a way to prevent weeds from spreading.”


Trending Video

How to fix a leaking pond.

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.