IDEAL 8T is an Ideal Combine

Dec 04, 2024
By Ryan Ridley
Assistant Editor, North American Content, Farms.com

Quick Attach Tech Allows You to Mount Header in 10 Seconds

Those interested in a class 8 combine are in the right place.

Fendt’s IDEAL 8T combine could be exactly what you are looking for, with some new technology to make your harvest as efficient as possible.

To learn more about the IDEAL 8T, Farms.com recently met with Kevin Forth, senior tactical marketing manager with Fendt.

“One of the greatest things about the Ideal combine is its 16-foot-long twin rotor machine, the longest in the industry,” says Forth. “That of course then leads into also the longest cleaning system in the industry.”

The combine also has one of the largest large grain tank and high-speed unloading system of six bushels per second.

Another feature is an industry-exclusive quick attach system for headers, called AutoDock.

“With a tap of a button in about 10 seconds, you can attach or detach your header,” adds Forth.

Forth elaborated that four cylinders extend to connect your drive lines, your multi coupler and your header lock pins—tap a switch in the cab and away you go.

New for 2025 is the IDEAL Air Blaster which uses an air compressor already on the machine to remove dust and debris from the header.

You can manually hit a button for the Air Blaster to remove the debris or set a timer for it to engage automatically.

Watch the below video to see the IDEAL 8T combine, AutoDock and Air Blaster up close.

For those interested in precision agriculture, subscribe here at no cost to the Farms.com Precision Ag Digital Digest released 4x per year.

View the Fall 2024 Farms.com Precision Agriculture Digital Digest here.

Video: The 15-Year Bet Behind Every New Variety!

Canada is trying to decide how much agricultural research capacity it can afford to lose. Brian Rossnagel believes the better question is whether the country can afford to rebuild it.

The longtime barley and oat breeder makes the case with a simple fact about his profession: the consequences of today’s decisions may not become visible for 10 or 15 years.

“Pick the right parents. That’s the biggest thing,” Rossnagel says. “If you pick the wrong parents, you’re not going to get anywhere—and you don’t know that until 10 years, 15 years later.”

That warning carries particular weight as Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada moves to reduce spending and streamline parts of its science operations. The department’s 2026–27 plan anticipates the loss of approximately 665 positions by 2028–29 and says some research will be reduced where capacity exists in academia or industry. AAFC says the changes will make its science operations more cost-effective over the long term.

For Canada’s seed industry, Rossnagel’s career illustrates what is at stake.

This fall, the retired University of Saskatchewan breeder will be inducted into the Canadian Agricultural Hall of Fame. During his 35-year career at the Crop Development Centre, he helped develop more than 100 barley and oat varieties, including CDC Austenson—one of Western Canada’s most widely grown feed barleys. His induction recognizes not only those varieties, but the collaboration and research system that made them possible.

Rossnagel is quick to emphasize that none of it was the work of one person.

“The first thing I thought about was all the other people who contributed to whatever success I and my program had over the years,” he says. “We know that it’s not an individual who does this. It’s a group—a team.”

That team extends well beyond the breeder whose name appears beside a variety. It includes technicians, pathologists, quality specialists, statisticians, regional testing sites, seed growers and industry partners. It also includes the breeders who came before and those who will carry the germplasm forward.

CDC Fraser barley, for example, moved through three breeding careers. Its parents came from Brian Harvey’s program. Rossnagel advanced the material after Harvey retired, and Aaron Beattie later guided it through registration and release.

That kind of handoff is normal in plant breeding. The person who makes the original cross may never see the resulting variety reach farmers.

It also explains why lost research capacity cannot simply be switched back on when budgets improve.

“If you shut it off, it’s very, very difficult—and particularly costly—to start it up again,” Rossnagel says. “If you have to start from scratch, it’s going to be at least 10 years before anybody notices whether you’re getting anything done or not.”

The concern is not simply how many experimental lines Canada can process. Modern equipment, statistical tools and genetic technologies allow today’s breeding programs to evaluate tens of thousands of lines—far more than Rossnagel could handle when he entered the field in the early 1970s.

But efficiency and automation do not generate every idea.

“If you pare back down, and instead of having six or seven individual scientists concentrating on wheat breeding, you go down and say three people could handle all this, well, that’s half the ideas gone,” he says. “Particularly if you happen to lose the three people who had the really neat and innovative ideas, boy, that’s a problem.”

It is a timely distinction for Canadian agriculture. Consolidating programs may preserve the volume of material moving through a system, at least initially. It may not preserve the diversity of thinking, regional knowledge or willingness to pursue unconventional crosses.

That regional knowledge matters because Canadian agriculture is not one uniform production environment. A variety suited to southern Alberta may face different disease, moisture and maturity pressures than one grown in Manitoba, Ontario or Atlantic Canada.

“Agriculture is applied biology,” Rossnagel says. “Biology, all around the Earth, moves from the poles to the equator. It does not move from Newfoundland to B.C. like politics do.”