Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

OMAFRA releases latest Field Crop Report 31 Aug 2016

Report was released August 31

By Diego Flammini
Assistant Editor, North American Content
Farms.com

OMAFRA’s Field Crop Team released its latest Field Crop Report, and fall forages were the central theme.

As with many crops throughout the province, the rains last week played an important role in field development.

“With the recent rains, many hay fields have seen significant growth in the last two weeks,” the Field Crop Team writes.

However, farmers now need to decide whether to take a fall cutting of alfalfa.

Alfalfa field

“This year, plants have been stressed from the dry weather and now we are contemplating stressing them further by taking a fall cutting,” the report says. “Even if there is no winterkill, the added stress typically results in the delay of first cut in the spring with yields reduced by roughly the same tonnage that would be harvested in the fall.”

Cutting alfalfa close to a killing frost can minimize the risk of winterkill. 

If alfalfa is cut before a frost, there could be little regrowth to deplete nutrient reserves. If it’s cut after, the leaves can start to drop and nutrients will leach out of the plant.

According to the Field Crop Report, a killing frost for alfalfa occurs when the temperature reaches -4°C for several hours.


Trending Video

Michigan Cover Crop Decision Tool Update 2026

Video: Michigan Cover Crop Decision Tool Update 2026

Abigail Smith, NRCS State Agronomist, Monica Jean, MSU Extension Field Crops Educator, and Madelyn Cleovsky, MSU Extension Conservation Agronomist Educator, discuss 2025 updates made to MCCC’s Cover Crop Decision Tool for Michigan.

This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under agreement number 2023-38640-39573 through the North Central Region SARE program under project number ENC23-226. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and service provider. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.