Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

U.S. farmers paying more to produce

U.S. farmers paying more to produce

Growers paid a total of US$359.8 billion in production costs in 2017

By Diego Flammini
Staff Writer
Farms.com

The costs associated with running a commercial farm operation are increasing, a recent report indicates.

American farmers collectively paid US$359.8 billion to operate their farms in 2017, the USDA’s most recent Farm Production Expenditures summary says. That figure is up from US$346.9 billion in 2016.

Growers paid an average of US$176,352 to farm last year compared to US$169,035 in 2016.

The four largest expenditures for American farms in 2017 were feed, farm services, livestock, poultry and related expenses, and labor.

U.S. farmers also spent US$12 billion at the pumps for diesel to operate their equipment.

Within the Corn Belt, farmers in Iowa paid the most to run their farms.

State farmers paid US$26.4 million in operation costs last year. Livestock, poultry and “related expenses” accounted for US$4.3 million of the total expenditures, the USDA says.

Only farmers in two U.S. states paid less to operate their farms in 2017 than they did in 2016.

Farming in Georgia costed producers a total of US$7.09 million in 2017, which is down from US$7.1 million the year before.

And farmers in Minnesota paid US$16.69 million to produce crops, dairy and livestock in 2017. In 2016, farmers in the state spent US$17.2 million.

These large figures are an indication of how far the American ag industry has come in terms of production costs.

In 1973, when the USDA published its first Farm Production Expenditures survey for the 1971 crop year, American farmers paid US$54.5 billion in production costs.

That figure averaged out to about US$18,741 per farm.

Farms.com has reached out to ag economists for insights on potential reasons for the cost increases and how farmers can navigate these business expenses.


Trending Video

Will the 2025 USDA December Crop Report Be a Market Mover/Surprise?

Video: Will the 2025 USDA December Crop Report Be a Market Mover/Surprise?


Historically, the USDA December crop report is a non-event or another dud report as the USDA reserves any final supply changes to the final report in January of the following year in this case 2026. But after the longest U.S. government shutdown in history at 43 days and no October crop report will they provide more data/surprise and make an exception?
Our China U.S. soybean purchase tracker is now at 26.6% or a total of 3.2 mmt but for traders it’s taking too long to unfold.
The final Stats Canada production report was bearish canola and wheat projection a record crop in both (it adds to the global glut of supplies) and bullish local corn and soybean prices in Ontario/Quebec thanks to a drought. It will not help the fund flow short-term, the USDA may need to offset it?
A U.S. Fed interest rate cut of another 25-basis point next Wednesday (probability 87.1%) could help fund flow and sentiment in stock and ag commodities into year end.
More inflows into Bitcoin this past week saw prices rebound back above 90,000 with support at 82,000 and resistance at 96,000.
A V-shaped bottom in cattle suggest the lows are in after Mexico reported another new world screwworm case. Lower weights, seasonal demand and higher U.S. beef select/choice values with a continued closure of the Mexican border to cattle will result in a resumption of higher cattle futures into yearend.
Australia is expected to produce its 3rd largest wheat crop ever at 36 mmt adding to the global glut of supplies.
Reports of ASF in hogs in Spain the largest pork exporter in Europe could see the U.S. win more pork export business long-term.
If the rains verify into next week of 3-5 inches for Brazil it would go a long way to fixing the dry regions from the last 2-months, but the European weather model has been wrong for the past 2-months!
Natural gas futures are surging to the 3rd price count as frigid hold temps set in.
CDN $ is also surging to end the week on a very resilient economy and better employment numbers suggesting no interest rate cuts next week.
Finally, the CFTC report showed funds were net buyers of soybeans but sellers of corn, canola and wheat. In real time the funds have gone back to selling as they take some profits.