U.S. winter wheat harvest begins: 2022

Jun 08, 2022

Farmers have harvested about 5 percent of the crop

By Diego Flammini
Staff Writer
Farms.com

U.S. farmers have started to harvest the 2021 winter wheat crop.

Farmers have harvested about 5 percent of the crop, the USDA’s Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin said on June 5.

The USDA estimated farmers planted 34.4 million acres of winter wheat in 2021, meaning growers have harvested about 1,720,000 acres so far.

On a state level, farmers in Texas have harvested the most winter wheat.

Growers there have combined about 36 percent of the state’s winter wheat acres.

Aside from multiple states not reporting any winter wheat harvested, farmers in Missouri have harvested the least amount of wheat.

Growers in that state have harvested just 1 percent of their winter wheat, the USDA reports.

More than three quarters of the U.S. corn crop has emerged.

About 78 percent of the crop is up, the USDA’s June 5 report says. This is up from 61 percent last week.

U.S. producers intended to plant about 89.5 million acres in 2022.

That means about 69,810,000 acres of corn has emerged.

Corn in North Carolina is the furthest along.

About 98 percent of corn in that state is up. Conversely, corn in North Dakota is only 22 percent emerged.

And a little more than half of the U.S. soybean crop is emerged.

Around 56 percent of the soybean crop is up, the USDA reported. This is up from 39 percent last week.

Farmers intended to plant 91 million acres of soybeans, meaning about 50,960,000 acres of soybeans are up.

Soybeans in Louisiana are the furthest along, reporting 98 percent of soybeans emerged.

Soybeans in North Dakota, on the other hand, are only 4 percent emerged.

Video: The 15-Year Bet Behind Every New Variety!

Canada is trying to decide how much agricultural research capacity it can afford to lose. Brian Rossnagel believes the better question is whether the country can afford to rebuild it.

The longtime barley and oat breeder makes the case with a simple fact about his profession: the consequences of today’s decisions may not become visible for 10 or 15 years.

“Pick the right parents. That’s the biggest thing,” Rossnagel says. “If you pick the wrong parents, you’re not going to get anywhere—and you don’t know that until 10 years, 15 years later.”

That warning carries particular weight as Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada moves to reduce spending and streamline parts of its science operations. The department’s 2026–27 plan anticipates the loss of approximately 665 positions by 2028–29 and says some research will be reduced where capacity exists in academia or industry. AAFC says the changes will make its science operations more cost-effective over the long term.

For Canada’s seed industry, Rossnagel’s career illustrates what is at stake.

This fall, the retired University of Saskatchewan breeder will be inducted into the Canadian Agricultural Hall of Fame. During his 35-year career at the Crop Development Centre, he helped develop more than 100 barley and oat varieties, including CDC Austenson—one of Western Canada’s most widely grown feed barleys. His induction recognizes not only those varieties, but the collaboration and research system that made them possible.

Rossnagel is quick to emphasize that none of it was the work of one person.

“The first thing I thought about was all the other people who contributed to whatever success I and my program had over the years,” he says. “We know that it’s not an individual who does this. It’s a group—a team.”

That team extends well beyond the breeder whose name appears beside a variety. It includes technicians, pathologists, quality specialists, statisticians, regional testing sites, seed growers and industry partners. It also includes the breeders who came before and those who will carry the germplasm forward.

CDC Fraser barley, for example, moved through three breeding careers. Its parents came from Brian Harvey’s program. Rossnagel advanced the material after Harvey retired, and Aaron Beattie later guided it through registration and release.

That kind of handoff is normal in plant breeding. The person who makes the original cross may never see the resulting variety reach farmers.

It also explains why lost research capacity cannot simply be switched back on when budgets improve.

“If you shut it off, it’s very, very difficult—and particularly costly—to start it up again,” Rossnagel says. “If you have to start from scratch, it’s going to be at least 10 years before anybody notices whether you’re getting anything done or not.”

The concern is not simply how many experimental lines Canada can process. Modern equipment, statistical tools and genetic technologies allow today’s breeding programs to evaluate tens of thousands of lines—far more than Rossnagel could handle when he entered the field in the early 1970s.

But efficiency and automation do not generate every idea.

“If you pare back down, and instead of having six or seven individual scientists concentrating on wheat breeding, you go down and say three people could handle all this, well, that’s half the ideas gone,” he says. “Particularly if you happen to lose the three people who had the really neat and innovative ideas, boy, that’s a problem.”

It is a timely distinction for Canadian agriculture. Consolidating programs may preserve the volume of material moving through a system, at least initially. It may not preserve the diversity of thinking, regional knowledge or willingness to pursue unconventional crosses.

That regional knowledge matters because Canadian agriculture is not one uniform production environment. A variety suited to southern Alberta may face different disease, moisture and maturity pressures than one grown in Manitoba, Ontario or Atlantic Canada.

“Agriculture is applied biology,” Rossnagel says. “Biology, all around the Earth, moves from the poles to the equator. It does not move from Newfoundland to B.C. like politics do.”