Farms.com Home   News

2019 and 2015 through 2019 – Characteristics of Higher Profit Farms

By Dale Lattz
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics
University of Illinois

By Bradley Zwilling
Illinois FBFM Association and Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics
University of Illinois

Data from the Illinois Farm Business Farm Management Association (FBFM) for 2015 through 2019 was used to analyze selected differences between the highest profit grain farms (high one-third) and the lower profit grain farms (low one-third).  The analysis was done for 2019 and for the 2015 through 2019 five-year average.  Farms in the higher profit group were larger, had higher corn and soybean yields, and had higher gross returns and lower costs.  Management returns, a profit measurement, was significantly greater for the higher profit farms.

Farms are grouped by region in the state – north, central and south.  The central region is also divided into a group of higher productive soils and a group with less productive soils.  All farms were at least 500 acres in size with no or very limited livestock enterprises.

Crop Yields

The higher profit farms generally had higher corn and soybean yields.  For 2019, the higher profit farms had higher corn yields ranging from 8 bushels per acre in northern Illinois to 19 bushels per acre in southern Illinois.  Soybean yields were 5 bushels to 8 bushels per acre higher for the higher profit farms in 2019.  The higher corn and soybean yields were the main factor for gross farm returns being $63 per acre to $176 per acre higher for the higher profit farms in 2019.  Similar results were found when comparing the 2015 through 2019 average for the higher one-third profit farms to the lower one-third profit farms.  Corn yields were 7 bushels to 20 bushels per acre higher for the higher profit farms and soybean yields were 4 bushels to 7 bushels per acre higher.  For the five-year average comparison, gross farm returns were $80 to $132 per acre higher.

Crop Rotation

For 2019, more acres were planted to corn than soybeans in northern and southern Illinois for the higher profit farms while in central Illinois the opposite was true with slightly more acres planted to soybeans then corn.  For the 2015 through 2019 average, northern and central Illinois planted more acres to soybeans than corn while the opposite was true for southern Illinois.

Farm Size

Farm size seems to be a contributing factor to the profitability as the higher profit farms were noticeably larger, generally from 400 to 700 acres larger depending on the period and the region in the state.  The one exception is in southern Illinois where the average size of the farms in 2019 was only 47 acres more for the higher profitable farms.  The larger farms are able to spread their labor and machinery costs over more acres contributing to lower costs per acre and higher profitability.

Selected Expenses

Two expense categories were analyzed in the study, crop costs and power and equipment costs.  Crop costs include fertilizer, seed and pesticides.  The main power and equipment costs are fuel, repairs, machine hire and lease expense and depreciation.  Crop costs were $4 to $24 per acre lower in 2019 for the different regions and $25 to $39 per acre less for the different regions for the 2015 through 2019 average comparison.  Power and equipment costs were $24 to $50 per acre less in 2019 and $36 to $40 per acre less for the five-year average comparison.

Management Returns

The combination of higher gross returns and lower costs per acre result in significantly higher management returns per acre for the higher profitable farms.  For 2019, management returns were $200 to $220 per acre higher for the higher profitable farms and for the 2015 through 2019 average, management returns were $207 to $232 per acre higher.

Summary

Many factors contribute to some farms being more profitable than other farms.  A few of these factors, such as weather, farm operators cannot control.  However, many factors, such as crop and machinery costs, operators can control.  As in past studies of this type, not one single factor is the main contributor to the difference in profitability but many factors put together.

Source : illinois.edu

Trending Video

Is China Buying US Soybeans + USDA Nov 14th Crop Report could be “Game Changing”

Video: Is China Buying US Soybeans + USDA Nov 14th Crop Report could be “Game Changing”


After a week of a U.S./China trade truce, markets/trade is skeptical that we have not seen a signed agreement nor heard much from China or seen any details. There are rumors that China is buying soybean futures & not the physical. Trust in Trump?
12 MMT of U.S. soybean purchases by China by year-end is better than 0 but we all need to give it more time and give it a chance to unfold. China did lower the tariffs on Ag and is buying U.S. wheat and sorghum.
U.S. supreme court could rule against Trumps tariffs, but the Trump administration does have a plan B.
U.S. government shutdown is now the longest in history at 38 days.
But despite a U.S. government shutdown we will be getting a USDA November crop report next Friday and it could be “game changing.” If the USDA provides a bullish surprise with lower U.S. corn and soybean yields and ending stocks that are lower than expected both corn and soybean futures will break out above their ceilings at $4.35/bu and $11.35/bu respectively.
The funds continued their selling in live and feeder cattle futures on continued fears that the Trump administration want to lower U.S. beef prices. The fundamentals have not changed, only market psychology has.
Stocks markets continue to worry about a weak U.S. job market, but you can blame ChatGPT for that. In the future, we will have a more efficient, productive and growing economy with a higher unemployment rate until we have more skilled AI workers.
After 34 new record highs in the S & P 500 and 124 new records in the NASDAQ in 2025 we are back to a correction and investor profit taking as AI valuations may have gotten too stretched near-term ahead of NVDA’s 3rd quarter earnings announcement on Nov. 19th. But this is not an AI bubble.
75% of Tesla shareholders approved a $1 trillion pay package for Elon Musk!
It has rained in South America in the last 7 days, but both the American and European models agree that Central Brazil remains dry in the next 14-days!