Farms.com Home   News

Agriculture This Week: Be wise and thorough in seeking answers

While I would not suggest anyone trust a post on social media as fact without delving into the statement further with some research, there are times something gets posted that is at least worth a moment’s pause to consider.

As I readied to write this week’s column I happened upon a post which wondered with some amazement how we have become a culture that considers Twinkies, cocoa puffs and Mountain Dew safe, but raw milk and compost grown tomatoes unsafe.

Like most things on social media the statement is a bit simplistic in as much as there is good reason milk has been pasteurized for decades, and one should hold some trust in processed foods following rules established by bodies which monitor such things.

That said there is a kernel of truth in the statement too, one which alludes to how disconnected we are from our food sources.

There is a concern that many are increasingly concerned about how farmers produce food and question whether they are producing food safe to put on the dinner table.

Fertilizers and crop protection products are seen as dangerous bugaboos by many.

Of course we don’t want wheat grown with ergot because farmers have no access to fungicides.

And, we don’t really want meat from sick livestock on the barbecue either, so vaccines and antibiotics used ethically are not a great evil.

Of course questioning food is not wrong either, if one researches carefully and trusts the best science since it’s the only option in ultimately determining food safety.

And, when asking questions about one’s food, it should certainly include processed foods, because something like microwaveable bacon, and seemingly indestructible Twinkies at least warrant a closer look by common sense at least.

The answer should be to get back to having greater control of our foot source.

Maybe a front lawn where we work to kill every weed – often with chemicals – is not the answer.

What if the patch of land grew our potatoes?

What if we forgot an ornamental shrub for a fruit tree?

Maybe our second vehicle sits outside so – in forward thinking communities at least – we can have a few laying hens for eggs?

Could we create ‘mini co-ops’ where a few buy a sow that a farmer raises, so the participants get a side of pork each year as part of ‘membership’?

Our food is important, and we need as much control as is reasonable to each individual.

And, of course ask questions, but always be aware of the source of any answer offered.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

How to fix a leaking pond.

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.