Farms.com Home   News

AgriStability Participants Advised Of Important Deadline

 
The Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (SCIC) is reminding producers of an important date for participation in the AgriStability Program. September 30, 2017, is the initial deadline for producers enrolled in the program to submit their 2016 program forms.
 
Submitting program forms is part of the annual process for participating in the Program and the information provided determines whether the producer qualifies for a benefit payment and builds the farm’s program history. Producers who file by September 30 can be certain their financial profile is up to date and their individual reference margin is established and available should something unforeseen happen to their farm.
 
A great way to manage a farm’s AgriStability information is through AgConnect, a secure online application giving producers the ability to review previous AgriStability information and submit new information. AgConnect is easy to use and accessible online 24/7. Information submitted through AgConnect enters SCIC’s system directly, allowing for quicker file processing. Knowledgeable staff are readily available to help producers activate their AgConnect account. Contact the AgriStability call centre at 1-866-270-8450.
 
Please keep in mind any 2016 program forms received after September 30, 2017, are subject to a penalty. AgriStability benefits will be reduced by $500 per month until December 31, the final date for program form submission. Penalties do not apply when a benefit is calculated at zero.
 
Source : Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.