Competition from Other Crops to Hurt Sunflower Output

Mar 03, 2021

After reaching the highest level in more than a decade in 2020, Canadian sunflower production is expected to fall back to earth this year.

Robert Deraas, the Minnesota-based general manager of Scoular’s sunflower and bird food business in Winkler, Man., said the big crop in 2020 was driven by strong demand and higher prices. However, he admitted growers may be inclined to seed other crops this year. “There’s much more crop competition than last year (from) all major and specialty crops. It’s made it more difficult, more competitive for sunflowers in this marketplace,” he said.

Last year, Canadian sunflower planted area jumped to almost 112,000 acres, an increase of more than 46%. Production climbed to 101,300 tonnes, the largest crop since 101,900 tonnes in 2009. American sunflower production increased last year as well, rising 52% to 1.35 million tonnes amid a sharp increase in planted area as well as average yields.

In its first new-crop supply-demand estimates released in January, Agriculture Canada projected new-crop sunflower seeded area at 86,485 acres, down 22% from 2020.

Sunflower prices in the leading US market have continued their upward trend of the past few weeks, with oil-type sunflower prices at North Dakota crushers currently ranging from about US$20.75 to $21.15/cwt. New-crop US prices run from about US$21 to $21.25/cwt.

Still, Deraas said sunflowers do offer growers plenty of benefits, including a later harvest date and relative market stability. He admitted the COVID-19 pandemic has hurt confection-type sunflowers, with a drop in snacking. However, he maintained that sunflower demand for bird feeding, both in terms of oil and confection, has remained strong.

“The demand is very stable and not subject so much to the highs and lows of world price fluctuations,” he said. “We fully expect acres will go down in 2021 and the price will be at or near 2020 levels.”

Click here to see more...

Video: The 15-Year Bet Behind Every New Variety!

Canada is trying to decide how much agricultural research capacity it can afford to lose. Brian Rossnagel believes the better question is whether the country can afford to rebuild it.

The longtime barley and oat breeder makes the case with a simple fact about his profession: the consequences of today’s decisions may not become visible for 10 or 15 years.

“Pick the right parents. That’s the biggest thing,” Rossnagel says. “If you pick the wrong parents, you’re not going to get anywhere—and you don’t know that until 10 years, 15 years later.”

That warning carries particular weight as Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada moves to reduce spending and streamline parts of its science operations. The department’s 2026–27 plan anticipates the loss of approximately 665 positions by 2028–29 and says some research will be reduced where capacity exists in academia or industry. AAFC says the changes will make its science operations more cost-effective over the long term.

For Canada’s seed industry, Rossnagel’s career illustrates what is at stake.

This fall, the retired University of Saskatchewan breeder will be inducted into the Canadian Agricultural Hall of Fame. During his 35-year career at the Crop Development Centre, he helped develop more than 100 barley and oat varieties, including CDC Austenson—one of Western Canada’s most widely grown feed barleys. His induction recognizes not only those varieties, but the collaboration and research system that made them possible.

Rossnagel is quick to emphasize that none of it was the work of one person.

“The first thing I thought about was all the other people who contributed to whatever success I and my program had over the years,” he says. “We know that it’s not an individual who does this. It’s a group—a team.”

That team extends well beyond the breeder whose name appears beside a variety. It includes technicians, pathologists, quality specialists, statisticians, regional testing sites, seed growers and industry partners. It also includes the breeders who came before and those who will carry the germplasm forward.

CDC Fraser barley, for example, moved through three breeding careers. Its parents came from Brian Harvey’s program. Rossnagel advanced the material after Harvey retired, and Aaron Beattie later guided it through registration and release.

That kind of handoff is normal in plant breeding. The person who makes the original cross may never see the resulting variety reach farmers.

It also explains why lost research capacity cannot simply be switched back on when budgets improve.

“If you shut it off, it’s very, very difficult—and particularly costly—to start it up again,” Rossnagel says. “If you have to start from scratch, it’s going to be at least 10 years before anybody notices whether you’re getting anything done or not.”

The concern is not simply how many experimental lines Canada can process. Modern equipment, statistical tools and genetic technologies allow today’s breeding programs to evaluate tens of thousands of lines—far more than Rossnagel could handle when he entered the field in the early 1970s.

But efficiency and automation do not generate every idea.

“If you pare back down, and instead of having six or seven individual scientists concentrating on wheat breeding, you go down and say three people could handle all this, well, that’s half the ideas gone,” he says. “Particularly if you happen to lose the three people who had the really neat and innovative ideas, boy, that’s a problem.”

It is a timely distinction for Canadian agriculture. Consolidating programs may preserve the volume of material moving through a system, at least initially. It may not preserve the diversity of thinking, regional knowledge or willingness to pursue unconventional crosses.

That regional knowledge matters because Canadian agriculture is not one uniform production environment. A variety suited to southern Alberta may face different disease, moisture and maturity pressures than one grown in Manitoba, Ontario or Atlantic Canada.

“Agriculture is applied biology,” Rossnagel says. “Biology, all around the Earth, moves from the poles to the equator. It does not move from Newfoundland to B.C. like politics do.”