Farms.com Home   News

Cow-Calf Corner: Cow and Heifer Slaughter Still Strong but Declining

By Derrell S. Peel

Heifer slaughter remained strong in the first half of 2023 but does show signs of declining going forward.  For the first half of the year, total heifer slaughter was down 0.5 percent year over year with a decrease of over four percent in the month of June.  The July Cattle report will be released by USDA on July 21 and the industry is looking to see if there are any indications that herd liquidation has ended, and herd rebuilding might begin.  The report is expected to show that herd liquidation continued in the first six months of the year but may slow in the remainder of the year.  There is no data currently to support the idea that heifer retention is underway but it may have started with recent improvements in range and pasture conditions.  The beef replacement heifer number in the upcoming report will be of keen interest and is likely to show a still smaller number compared to last year but could show a slight increase year over year if heifer retention has begun.

The cattle inventory report will show that the beef cow herd continued to decline in the first half of the year.  While beef cow slaughter is down thus far…down 12.0 percent year over year in the first six months of the year…the current pace suggests a herd culling rate over 12 percent for the year.  Beef herd expansion requires a herd culling rate below ten percent and likely below nine percent for a year or more.  Beef cow slaughter is likely to decrease more significantly in the second half of the year but is unlikely to drop enough to come close to stabilizing the beef cow herd this year. Total cow plus heifer slaughter through June averaged 51.8 percent of total cattle slaughter.  This percentage indicates continuing herd liquidation.  Total female slaughter will drop below 45 percent of total slaughter during active herd expansion.  This is unlikely to happen before 2024 at least.

The July Cattle report is expected to show that herd liquidation continued in the first half of the year.  The report is unlikely to show definitive signs of strong heifer retention but could indicate the beginning of retention if the beef heifer inventory is down just slightly or possibly even up slightly.  

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

US Soy: Pig growth is impaired by soybean meal displacement in the diet

Video: US Soy: Pig growth is impaired by soybean meal displacement in the diet

Eric van Heugten, PhD, professor and swine extension specialist at North Carolina State University, recently spoke at the Iowa Swine Day Pre-Conference Symposium, titled Soybean Meal 360°: Expanding our horizons through discoveries and field-proven feeding strategies for improving pork production. The event was sponsored by Iowa State University and U.S. Soy.

Soybean meal offers pig producers a high-value proposition. It’s a high-quality protein source, providing essential and non-essential amino acids to the pig that are highly digestible and palatable. Studies now show that soybean meal provides higher net energy than current National Research Council (NRC) requirements. Plus, soybean meal offers health benefits such as isoflavones and antioxidants as well as benefits with respiratory diseases such as porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS).

One of several ingredients that compete with the inclusion of soybean meal in pig diets is dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS).

“With DDGS, we typically see more variable responses because of the quality differences depending on which plant it comes from,” said Dr. van Heugten. “At very high levels, we often see a reduction in performance especially with feed intake which can have negative consequences on pig performance, especially in the summer months when feed intake is already low and gaining weight is at a premium to get them to market.”

Over the last few decades, the industry has also seen the increased inclusion of crystalline amino acids in pig diets.

“We started with lysine at about 3 lbs. per ton in the diet, and then we added methionine and threonine to go to 6 to 8 lbs. per ton,” he said. “Now we have tryptophan, isoleucine and valine and can go to 12 to 15 lbs. per ton. All of these, when price competitive, are formulated into the diet and are displacing soybean meal which also removes the potential health benefits that soybean meal provides.”