Farms.com Home   News

Determine Proper Timing For PGR Applications

By Jim Steadman 
 
Accelerated growth of cotton plants during squaring means it’s time for growers to determine strategies for PGR applications.
 
In a recent blog, NC State Cotton Specialists Guy Collins and Keith Edmisten note that not all fields will need pre-bloom PGR applications, but that growers will need to manage their crop for earliness if acceptable rains (not excessive, not insufficient) persist through first bloom and thereafter.
 
“Let’s be clear, this does not necessarily mean that growers need to automatically be aggressive with PGRs,” say the authors. “However we will need to be timely with scouting for both growth parameters and insects (mainly plant bugs) and timely with any necessary action.
 
“At this point in time, PGRs should not be applied to cotton that is still struggling for whatever reason (earlier sand drowning, stunting from herbicides, water-logging, etc.) for the time being, just because it might be later than normal,” they add. “However, other fields with good or rapid growth (fields that have been top-dressed, have healthy plants, signs of vigorous growth, later planted, later varieties, heavier soils that aren’t water logged), may need a PGR application soon in order to guide the plant into an acceptable height once blooming begins.”
Click here to see more...

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.