Urea Leads Fertilizer Prices Higher

Mar 14, 2024

By Russ Quinn

crop
Fertilizer prices continue to move higher according to prices tracked by DTN for the first week of March 2024. For the first time in several months, a fertilizer showed a notable price move.

Seven of the eight major fertilizer prices were higher compared to a month earlier, marking the fourth week in a row that prices were mostly higher. DTN designates a significant move as anything 5% or more.

Urea pushed considerably higher, up 7% from last month. The nitrogen fertilizer had an average price of $564/ton.

Six other fertilizers were slightly more expensive. DAP had an average price of $760/ton, MAP $816/ton, 10-34-0 $622/ton, anhydrous $788/ton, UAN28 $344/ton and UAN32 $396/ton.

Meanwhile, remaining fertilizers were just slightly lower in price compared to last month. Potash had an average price of $505/ton.

On a price per pound of nitrogen basis, the average urea price was $0.61/lb.N, anhydrous $0.48/lb.N, UAN28 $0.61/lb.N and UAN32 $0.62/lb.N.

With the mild weather seen across the Corn Belt, farmers could be seeing an early spring. This situation might allow them to change their fertilizer application plans.

In a post titled "Thinking of Getting an Early Start on Fertilizer Applications? Here are a Few Things to Consider," University of Minnesota Extension nutrient management specialists discuss what options farmers might consider with more time to apply nutrients this spring.

Most fertilizers are water-soluble and will dissolve readily at this point, according to the post.

If the soil is not frozen, any fertilizer that dissolves will react with it and stay where applied. Nitrogen in fertilizers, such as MAP or DAP, is in the ammonium form andnot subject to volatility.

While nitrogen in the form of anhydrous ammonia and urea could be applied early, UAN should not be. Urea ammonium nitrate solutions contain half of the nitrogen as urea, so volatility can be an issue.

"A larger problem is that a quarter of the N in UAN is already in the nitrate form at application, and nitrate is subject to loss if there is excess water," according to the post.

Click here to see more...

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.