Farms.com Home   News

EPA Denies Counter 20G For Use On Cotton In Georgia

The EPA has denied a request by the Georgia Department of Agriculture to allow use of the pesticide Counter 20G on cotton in Georgia.

Georgia Agriculture Commissioner Gary Black wrote to the EPA on April 1 requesting a Section 18 exemption to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to give cotton growers a key tool to control nematodes. In his letter, Black pointed out that since the phase-out of aldicarb began in 2010, farmers have struggled to find an effective alternative pesticide to control nematodes in cotton. A replacement pesticide, Velum Total from Bayer CropScience, is only available in sufficient quantities to treat 25 percent of the acreage referenced in Black's exemption request.

"Cotton farmers across the region face a high pressure dilemma this growing season," Black wrote. "Costs for seed and other inputs will establish a very high mark on the production model over the next two months. Yet, commodity prices, without extraordinary yields, will not likely produce an acceptable if any level of profit. The Section 18 opportunity for Counter 20G in my view clearly provides us the pathway afforded by law to meet our regulatory obligations while helping American farm families when they need it the most."

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Michigan Cover Crop Decision Tool Update 2026

Video: Michigan Cover Crop Decision Tool Update 2026

Abigail Smith, NRCS State Agronomist, Monica Jean, MSU Extension Field Crops Educator, and Madelyn Cleovsky, MSU Extension Conservation Agronomist Educator, discuss 2025 updates made to MCCC’s Cover Crop Decision Tool for Michigan.

This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under agreement number 2023-38640-39573 through the North Central Region SARE program under project number ENC23-226. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and service provider. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.