Farms.com Home   News

Genetic Gain Before And After Genomics

By:

Lynsay Beavers

Brian Van Doormaal

You've likely heard the statement: "Genomics has doubled the rate of genetic progress". In this article, we find out if this claim is true by looking at genetic gain for indexes and individual traits before and after the implementation of genomic evaluations.

Female Genetic Trend for LPI and Pro$

Figure 1 shows the genetic trend for LPI and Pro$ for Canadian Holstein females based on year of birth. The trends for LPI and Pro$ are essentially identical but since the scales for the two indexes are different they are plotted on different lines.

Prior to genomics, which began in 2009 for Holsteins, the average LPI for females born during the 5-year period from 2004 to 2009 was increasing by 50 LPI points per year. Since the introduction of genomics (vertical line in Figure 1), this rate of genetic progress has increased substantially. For females born in the past five years, from 2011 to 2016, the average LPI has increased gains of 107 points per year - over twice the amount of annual gain prior to genomics.

During the same time periods, the annual genetic trend for Pro$ increased from $79 before genomics to $176 per year during the past five years. This has happened without selection for Pro$ as the index was only introduced in August 2015. However, since Pro$ is made up of many of the same traits as LPI and the two indexes are correlated by 96%, selection for LPI was leading to an associated progress for Pro$ before this national index existed.

Genetic Gain Before And After Genomics

Genetic Gain for Individual Traits

Like for overall indexes, genetic gain for individual traits can be assessed before and after genomics. Figure 2 shows the relative genetic gain by trait realized during the five years before genomics and during the most recent five years with genomics. Genetic gain is expressed in standardized units so that gain can be comparable across traits with different units of expression.

When comparing the gains achieved during the two 5-year periods, we can see that:

  • Gains achieved with genomics have been positive for all traits, including lower heritability functional traits. Prior to genomics, gains for most functional traits were slow and even negative for some traits, such as Daughter Fertility. The impressive gain for these low heritability traits is a direct result of the increase in the accuracy of genetic evaluations due to genomics. Overall, the largest gains relative to the five years before genomics are seen for functional traits.
  • Gains achieved with genomics were doubled for Fat and Protein Yields while also making considerably higher genetic gains for deviations.
  • Gains achieved with genomics were the highest for overall type traits, especially Conformation and Mammary System, but these traits were also achieving the highest rates of genetic progress prior to genomics. These past and continued gains are partially due to the high selection intensity for these traits.
  • Gains achieved with genomics were doubled for Feet and Legs, which is the least heritable among the five overall type traits. Since genomics significantly increases the accuracy of published evaluations, the genetic gain realized for this trait has been large.

Genetic Gain Before And After Genomics


Another way to compare the genetic gain achieved pre- and post-genomics is presented in Table 1. Here, gains are expressed in the same units as proofs for each given trait. For example, yields are expressed as EBV based on kilograms while most functional traits are expressed as Relative Breeding Value (RBV) points.

In Figure 2 we saw that with genomics, there has been twice the amount of genetic gain realized for Protein yield in terms of standard units.  Referring to Table 1, we can see that the combined gain for Protein yield during the five years prior to genomics was 11.8 kg, or around 2.4 kg per year. In the past five years with genomics, the combined gain was 24 kg, or 4.8 kg per year. This means that females born in the last 5 years in a herd with average management are expected to have 305 day lactation yields that increase roughly 5 kg per year, on average. In this case, double the genetic gain translates into double the performance increase for protein yield.

Likewise, when looking at the functional traits, the combined gain for Herd Life during the five years prior to genomics was 1.12 RBV points, or 0.22 RBV per year. Over the past five years, however, with genomics, the combined genetic gain for this trait was tripled to 3.36, or two-thirds of an RBV point of gain per year. Significant gains with genomics have also been observed for other functional traits, meaning that Holsteins today can be expected to last longer in the herd due to improved calving and reproductive performance along with higher resistance to disease.

Genetic Gain Before And After Genomics

Genetic gains have increased substantially across the board since the implementation of genomics in Canada. While all traits have benefitted from the increased accuracy the technology provides, this is particularly true for lower heritability functional traits. The increased gain for individual traits translates into a rate of progress that has doubled for both of Canada's national genetic indexes.

Source:CDN


Trending Video

Dairy Farmers Are Using This Important Tool to Meet Climate Goals

Video: Dairy Farmers Are Using This Important Tool to Meet Climate Goals

Discover the innovative approach dairy farmers are taking to reduce their environmental impact and meet climate goals. From reducing greenhouse gas emissions to sustainable farming practices, learn the trick that's making a significant difference in the dairy industry. Whether you're a farmer, environmentalist, or simply interested in sustainable living, this video reveals the surprising solution that's paving the way for a more eco-friendly future.

Sabino Ahlem-Herrera is a third-generation dairy farmer in Hilmar, California currently utilizing innovative technology like anaerobic digesters to trap methane gas and convert it into biogas, a form of pure energy. Only two percent of the state's public investment in methane reduction has gone to the dairy sector, yet this investment has driven a 30 percent reduction in methane emissions statewide.

Dr. Frank Mitloehner, air quality specialist and director of the UC Davis CLEAR Center, shares more about digesters and explains how current research at UC Davis is producing accurate data on their effectiveness and potential on dairy farms.