Farms.com Home   News

Grain Workers Union Strike Threatens Canadian Agriculture Exports

Another week brings another potential strike, this time by the Grain Workers Union (GWU), which, after a recent vote, will be in a legal strike position starting at 7:00 am Pacific Time on September 24th. “This will be another devastating blow to agriculture trade. A strike would see approximately 650 workers fully shutting down all major grain exporting terminals in Vancouver,” stated Daryl Fransoo, Chair of the Wheat Growers Association.

The timing of this strike could not be worse. Exporters are currently working hard with Chinese importers to move critical canola shipments before China retaliates against tariffs on EV’s, aluminum, and steel. The disruption would not only affect trade with China but would also impact shipments to other parts of the world, as vessels arrive in Vancouver to be loaded. Fransoo added, “These ongoing strikes have both immediate and long-term consequences. Vessel demurrage and cancelled contracts, with vessels diverted to other exporting nations, are immediate impacts. Long term, our reputation as a reliable supplier is being tarnished, and history shows this will affect future sales. The entire value chain, from exporters to producers, will feel the negative effects.”

“We have numerous independent unions on the waterfront that can disrupt the supply chain at any time,” commented Gunter Jochum, President of the Wheat Growers Association. Jochum further explained, “Under Clause 87.7 of the Canada Labour Code, grain is deemed essential to be loaded on vessels, but this clause does not apply to the GWU. We are efficient at producing the world’s highest quality grains and oilseeds, yet the government continues to allow these supply chain disruptions and fails to address the changes needed to grow this sector.”

Canada is the fifth-largest food exporter in the world, with agriculture exports valued over $99 billion in 2023. The success of Canada’s agriculture sector and its contribution to the nation’s GDP depend on the ability to reliably export to global markets. Fransoo closed by asking, “When will this government wake up and make all grain movement from ports an essential service?”

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

How to fix a leaking pond.

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.