Farms.com Home   News

Higher US Ethanol Production From Sorghum, Corn Yield

The higher ethanol production seen so far in 2016 has come from greater sorghum use and boosted yields from corn, said a professor emeritus at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

The Department of Agriculture’s monthly World Agriculture Supply and Demand estimates project the amount of corn used for ethanol production. For the current marketing year, the USDA projects 1.3% more corn will be used to produce ethanol than the 2015-16 marketing year.

Ethanol production, however, is up 3.2% from last year, said agriculture and economics professor emeritus Darrel Good in a podcast released Monday. In the most recent Energy Information Administration data, output was 3.16% higher than the same week last year.

“The small increase reflects increased year-over-year use of other feedstocks, particularly sorghum,” Good said.

But the amount of sorghum being used for ethanol production is harder to find than corn. The USDA doesn’t track sorghum’s use monthly, but in the 2015-16 marketing year ethanol production consumed 137 million bushels. The previous year saw just 18 million bushels used.

But sorghum and corn volumes combined weren’t sufficient to account for the increased ethanol production last year.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Michigan Cover Crop Decision Tool Update 2026

Video: Michigan Cover Crop Decision Tool Update 2026

Abigail Smith, NRCS State Agronomist, Monica Jean, MSU Extension Field Crops Educator, and Madelyn Cleovsky, MSU Extension Conservation Agronomist Educator, discuss 2025 updates made to MCCC’s Cover Crop Decision Tool for Michigan.

This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under agreement number 2023-38640-39573 through the North Central Region SARE program under project number ENC23-226. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and service provider. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.