Farms.com Home  › News

How do you keep a kid on the farm?

The truck’s name was Little George. It was brilliant orange, the only colour available when, decades before online shopping, Wanda McConnell went to town to pick up paint.

The truck takes up the foreground of a grainy photo, taken in the summer of 1973 around the time of the Hamiota parade. In it, Little George is hooked to a hay rack adorned with an old outhouse taken from the community’s old McConnell school building grounds and painted during the slow crawl of the parade route. Four teenagers pose in front of the little structure while another sits in the truck’s bed. They’re all wearing government-issued yellow hard hats.

“I think wearing them made us feel important,” McConnell said.

Why it matters: Concerns over rural depopulation have lingered for decades.

The kids, all between Grades 11 and 12, were a work crew. They’d been hired by the provincial government to do farm beautification and maintenance tasks in their community for the summer. It involved a lot of painting.

Plenty of barns, fences and community centres in rural Manitoba got a facelift that summer, based on interviews with McConnell and other former Rural STEP program participants.

STEP, or the Student Temporary Employment Program, was the rural youth work program launched by the Schreyer NDP government in the mid-70s in an effort to bridge the employment gap for young people in rural Manitoba.

It consisted of teams of teenagers led by college student supervisors. Those teams did odd jobs that had been chosen by their local agriculture office. It also paid minimum wage, often a better lot than what a teen could do babysitting or working the family farm.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

From Students to Solutions | On The Brink: Season 2, Episode 14

Video: From Students to Solutions | On The Brink: Season 2, Episode 14

Ask Canada’s most decorated soybean breeder his favourite part of the job and he doesn’t name a single variety. He names the students.

Istvan Rajcan is a professor of soybean breeding and genetics in the Department of Plant Agriculture at the University of Guelph, where he has run the soybean breeding program for 28 and a half years. In that time he has developed 87 soybean cultivars, published 140 refereed papers and trained 51 graduate students. In 2025 he received the Public Sector Impact Award from the National Association for Plant Breeding.

He is also worried. In this episode he says Canada is at a crossroads, pointing to recent government cuts to plant breeding programs and to the facilities that support them. His prescription is structural. "Plant breeding funding formula has to be a long-term one," he says.

The formula he is defending is the public-private matching arrangement his program runs on. Private seed companies fund the work, provincial or federal money matches it, and the combined pool stretches each dollar further than either source could alone. At the National Association for Plant Breeding annual meeting in June, he says American public breeders were often surprised at how well that collaboration works in Canada.

He also describes how the people entering plant breeding have changed. His early graduate students came mostly from farms. More recently they include, in his words, "city kids who just became excited about genetics."

Topics covered:

Why public-private plant breeding funding in Canada needs a long-term

commitment rather than a larger one

How matching private seed company investment with provincial and federal

dollars multiplies research capacity

How the graduate student pipeline into plant breeding has shifted from

farm kids to city kids