Farms.com Home   News

Increasing Planting Capacity: Wider Versus Faster Planters

Planting a West Tennessee field

Farming is known to be a difficult business. Many producers can have excellent weather and few pest and weed problems and still find themselves straddling the line between profitability and losing money because of their planting decisions.

Mike Buschermohle, a biosystems engineering professor in the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, says decisions regarding planting, including planting capacity, are among the most crucial decisions a farmer will make all year. At UT’s upcoming Milan No-Till Field Day, Buschermohle will discuss the results from a study that examined how planter width, planting speed and seed loading methods influence planting efficiency, or more importantly, how many acres you can expect to plant in a day.

First, Buschermohle says, it is imperative to understand planter performance. “Planting capacity is a function of the maximum capacity a planter can obtain while operating at 100 percent of its width for a given speed and planter efficiency at that speed.”

In a recent study, Buschermohle predicted field efficiency and capacity values across 41 fields using planters with different widths at planting speeds ranging from 4 to 12 mph.  As expected, the study showed that increasing planting speed decreased planting efficiency and increased planting capacity across all planting speeds and planter widths. What was a little surprising was the extent of the differences.

“For example, planting efficiency for a 38-foot wide planter with individual row-unit seed hoppers decreased from 76.4 percent to 58.2 percent and planting capacity increased from 14.1 to 26.8 ac/hr when planting speed was increased from 4 to 12 mph. Roughly a 24 percent drop in planting efficiency was observed for a 57- and 76-ft wide central fill planter across this same planting speed range,” Buschermohle said.

Increasing planter width was also found to decrease planting efficiency and increase planting capacity.

Buschermohle will discuss these comparisons with farmers and answer questions during the Precision Agriculture Tour at the UT Institute of Agriculture’s Milan No-Till Field Day scheduled for July 28 at UT’s AgResearch and Education Center in Milan. Billed as the nation’s largest no-till field day, researchers from Tennessee and other regional institutions present to farmers the latest management techniques to keep their farms profitable and sustainable through no-till and minimum tillage that “saves the soil” by sparing the plow. More information is available online at milan.tennessee.edu

Through its mission of research, teaching and extension, the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture touches lives and provides Real.

Source:tennessee.edu


Trending Video

Evolution of Beef Cattle Farming

Video: Evolution of Beef Cattle Farming

The Clear Conversations podcast took to the road for a special episode recorded in Nashville during CattleCon, bringing listeners straight into the heart of the cattle industry. Host Tracy Sellers welcomed rancher Steve Wooten of Beatty Canyon Ranch in Colorado for a wide-ranging discussion that blended family history and sustainability, particularly as it relates to the future of beef production.

Sustainability emerged as a central theme of the conversation, a word that Wooten acknowledges can mean very different things depending on who you ask. For him, sustainability starts with the soil. Healthy soil produces healthy grass, which supports efficient cattle capable of producing year after year with minimal external inputs. It’s an approach that equally considers vegetation, animal efficiency, and long-term profitability.

That philosophy aligned naturally with Wooten’s involvement in the U.S. Roundtable for Sustainable Beef, where he served as a representative for the Colorado Cattlemen’s Association. The roundtable brings together the entire beef supply chain—from producers to retailers—along with universities, NGOs, and allied industries. Its goal is not regulation, Wooten emphasized, but collaboration, shared learning, and continuous improvement.