Farms.com Home   News

Iowa Bill Would Prohibit Drone Use Near Livestock Operations

Iowa Bill Would Prohibit Drone Use Near Livestock Operations

By Mark Moran

The Iowa House has voted to ground drones over livestock containment and feedlots.

Critics of the measure say drones are used to document unhealthy conditions inside the facilities, but the bill's supporters say the devices are invading farmers' privacy and endangering animals.

House File 572 would restrict drones from flying within 400 feet of an area where farm animals are kept without the landowner's permission.

Rep. Derek Wulf, R-Hudson, a cattle rancher from Black Hawk County, said the bill is intended to protect the safety of Iowa's livestock, arguing drones cause the animals to act erratically.

"Pushing 'em through fences; one producer actually found a crashed drone in one of their feedlots," Wulf pointed out. "As the drone industry continues to progress and grow, it seems to be becoming a larger and larger concern for livestock producers, not only in this state, but seems like across the country."

If the bill passes, drone operators caught violating the restrictions would be guilty of a misdemeanor and the charges could become more severe if the drone takes pictures or video of the livestock operations. The bill is headed to the Senate.

As the recreational drone industry grows, Wulf noted there are most likely operators who are not intentionally trying to cause problems for livestock. On the other hand, he acknowledged the bill is a response to animal rights groups using drones to document conditions inside ag operations. Wulf added there are drone operators who are trying to be disruptive.
 

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

How to fix a leaking pond.

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.