Farms.com Home   News

Iowa Dairy Goat Survey Shows Potential for Growth and Improvement

Iowa Dairy Goat Survey Shows Potential for Growth and Improvement
By Jennifer Bentley
 
A recent survey of dairy goat producers in Iowa shows the opportunities and challenges faced by this industry.
 
Dairy goat production is important to Iowa, ranked third in the nation, with 214 licensed dairy goat herds and 34,000 milking does, according to the United States Department of Agriculture.
 
“Iowa Dairy Goat Farm Survey - Fall 2019” was the first survey of this kind to take a look at topics such as milk production and composition, housing and milking facilities, dairy farm management and planning for the future.
 
dairy goats in barn.The survey was led by Iowa State University Extension and Outreach dairy specialist Jenn Bentley and retired dairy specialist Leo Timms.
 
Bentley said it’s encouraging to see Iowa’s strong dairy goat position in the nation, and said there still appears to be room for growth. However, as the industry grows, she said the survey also shows some areas where producers face challenges.
 
Producers indicated that commodity prices, bacteria count and somatic cell count are the top three conditions that have significant impact and concern on their dairy goat business.
 
“Milking management and health issues would be a key area of education, given their concerns about conditions that impact their business,” Bentley said.
 
Record-keeping and understanding cost of production are two other areas that producers would find useful in staying successful in the dairy goat business.
 
According to the survey, 49% of respondents do not keep production records on individual goats and only 18% of respondents track their cost to produce 100 pounds of milk – the common standard dairy farms use to measure profitability.
 
The survey was mailed to 215 dairy goat producers in fall 2019, with a response rate of 41.5%. The top five responding counties were Johnson, Ringgold, Clayton, Jefferson and Washington.
 
Bentley said the results provide a useful understanding of the industry for farmers, extension specialists and the general public.
 
“This survey can be used to better serve our dairy goat producer audience, knowing what current issues they are facing and plans for the future,” Bentley said.
 
According to the survey, Iowa’s goat producers plan to continue with herd expansion and facility upgrades. Nearly half of respondents said they plan to expand their herd in the next five years, and more than half, 55% and 56% respectively, plan to update housing for milking does, and milking facilities, within the next 15 years.
Source : iastate.edu

Trending Video

Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.