Farms.com Home   News

Opinion: Don’t make fake ag news

Where does fake news come from? In the case of the Prairies this past week, its Saskatchewan’s provincial cabinet and a think-tank from Winnipeg. They aren’t alone. Politics and picking sides appear to be a pretty regular source of public lies designed to deceive.

In Canadian agriculture we can’t afford to be involved in fake news. We rely on our reputation for producing great products in a sustainable environment and, like it or not, we are only two out of every 100 Canadian voters and citizens. Other folks will decide for us whether we get to keep doing what we are doing or what we will have to change to meet their expectations.

How we manage other, largely urban Canadians’ opinions of us and the way we look after rural Canada is now up for continuous review. And no, it doesn’t matter who is running Ottawa.

Luckily, Canadian farmers do most things better than anyone, so our practices are easy to defend.

There is always a shred of truth in any fake news. That is what makes the false seem real. Farm land prices rose and some academics used that to justify an opinion that dairy farmers don’t need an increase in prices for their products. Every farmer knows you can’t farm without land, so its price, while one uses it, doesn’t create positive cash flow.

Another recent headline suggests that we could soon see “650,000 angry farmers descend on Ottawa.” The piece, written by a senior official at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy, repeats an oft-told lie that the federal government will cut farm fertilizer use by 30 percent, willfully reducing crop production, adding that it is “the same policy Holland’s government recently introduced.”

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Dicamba Returns for Georgia Farmers: What the New EPA Ruling Means for Cotton Growers

Video: Dicamba Returns for Georgia Farmers: What the New EPA Ruling Means for Cotton Growers

After being unavailable in 2024 due to registration issues, dicamba products are returning for Georgia farmers this growing season — but under strict new conditions.

In this report from Tifton, Extension Weed Specialist Stanley Culpepper explains the updated EPA ruling, including new application limits, mandatory training requirements, and the need for a restricted use pesticide license. Among the key changes: a cap of two ½-pound applications per year and the required use of an approved volatility reduction agent with every application.

For Georgia cotton producers, the ruling is significant. According to Taylor Sills with the Georgia Cotton Commission, the vast majority of cotton planted in the state carries the dicamba-tolerant trait — meaning farmers had been paying for technology they couldn’t use.

While environmental groups have expressed concerns over spray drift, Georgia growers have reduced off-target pesticide movement by more than 91% over the past decade. Still, this two-year registration period will come with increased scrutiny, making stewardship and compliance more important than ever.