Prussic Acid In Forages Poses A Threat To Livestock Following A Frost

Oct 05, 2015

By Phil Kaatz

During the fall season, frost will inevitably come to Michigan. When this happens, farmers and livestock producers should be on the lookout for problems associated with prussic acid. Another time to be looking for potential problems is when rain occurs following a drought or extended period of hot, dry weather. This has definitely not been a problem for most of Michigan in 2015.

Prussic acid is hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and is caused by cyanide production in several types of plants under certain growing conditions. Summer annual crops such as sorghum, sorghum-sudangrass or sudangrass are all types of forages that can develop dangerous levels of the poison. Both the grain and forage types of sorghums can producer HCN.

Level of prussic acid in forage (dry matter basis) and potential effect on animals
ppm HCN	Effect on animals
0-500	Generally safe; should not cause toxicity.
600-1,000	Potentially toxic; should not be the only source of feed.
1,000 and above	Dangerous to cattle and usually will cause death.

Source: Kansas State University Cooperative Extension Service

When frost occurs, the plant cells that accumulate cyanide rupture, releasing the poison. After a killing frost, wait at least four to five days allowing the HCN gas to disperse before allowing animals to graze. New growth after a frost or drought will have very high levels of HCN and be extremely dangerous. Producers should wait until new growth is 18-24 inches tall before grazing or green chopping the forage.

When harvesting forages following frost, Michigan State University Extension recommends it is always best to have the forage analyzed to insure levels of HCN are safe. Ensiling will allow the forage to respire and reduce the amount of HCN. However, I can’t stress the point enough to make sure producers get forage tested that may have a high level of HCN.

Source:msu.edu

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.