Farms.com Home   News

Read Between the Lines: Market Signals from Media Coverage

Bull markets eventually attract a lot of media coverage. That’s when you want to be cautious. This is an indication that the “easiest” part of the bull move is over.

If you think back to 2022, shortly after Russia attacked Ukraine, hardly a day went by without a story about how the agricultural markets would never be the same again. Although Russia’s horrible war still rages, to the great detriment of millions of innocent people, markets were already adapting as media headlines declared supplies and prices had been altered forever.

Dramatic headlines are also common during major droughts. Or major floods. Or political changes in a major commodity-producing nation.

At times, media coverage is rife with free advice on what to do or buy to profit from a price boom. This is just as true in the outside markets – Semiconductor stocks! Copper! – as it is in farm markets.

If you’re a farmer, it’s wise to realize that this sort of thing is sometimes a sign of a market top. When it’s the flavour of the day for discussion by urban media, the bull markets are usually either over or close to being over.

If you’re an investor, be careful about buying in late. By the time the news stories are telling you it’s a no-brainer to invest in certain ag stocks or farm-related stuff, the best deals are long gone. You’re no longer looking at true value buying opportunities.

If you’re a consumer, don’t panic. Even in the fallout from major global turmoil and weather events, North Americans pay a lesser percentage of disposable income on food than anyone else. Remember too, that the actual grain in a loaf of bread or cocoa in a chocolate bar, is usually less than the transportation to get that to the store shelf, less than the marketing/advertising, and often too it’s even less than the package it’s in.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.