Farms.com Home   News

Soil Nitrate-N Variability On Corn Fields With Repeated Manure Practices

By George Silva
 
Figure 1. Nitrate-N distribution in PSNT tests in 2016.
Figure 1. Nitrate-N distribution in PSNT tests in 2016.
 
The distribution of soil nitrate-N concentrations as demonstrated by 2016 pre-sidedress soil nitrate tests (PSNT) on seven corn fields, each with a history of repeated manure practices, is shown in Figure 1. The PSNT soil samples were taken in early to mid-June, a few days prior to the planned N sidedress date. A high level of N mineralization was expected on these fields. Mineralization is the process by which microorganisms decompose organic forms of N from manure, bio-solids and crop residues to plant-available, inorganic forms of N (first to ammonium N and then to nitrate N form). This process is most rapid when soil is warm (67-86 degrees Fahrenheit), moist and well-aerated.
 
The observed variability in nitrate N in the soil samples is a reflection of the diversity in type, amount and frequencies of manure applied, and site-specific soil and climatic factors influencing N mineralization and environmental losses. In light of this variability, the PSNT has to be done every year to determine the level of N credit. Corn producers are then able to adjust their N sidedress rates accordingly. 
 
Four out of the seven samples exceeded the critical nitrate-N level of 26 parts per million (ppm) or greater, thus requiring no additional N fertilizer and generating considerable cost savings to producers. The other three samples received varying amounts of N credit, based on the Maximum Return to Nitrogen (MRTN) recommendations approach (Table 1).
 

Table 1. PSNT soil test interpretation and N credit according to MRTN approach.

PSNT Nitrate-N (ppm)

Interpretation

Soil N credit* pounds per acre

Less than or equal to 10

Low to no N credit. Use full N recommendation.

0

11-15

Low to medium N credit. Reduce fertilizer N rate slightly.

30

16-20

Medium N credit. Reduce fertilizer N rate.

60

21-25

Medium to high N credit. Reduce fertilizer N rate substantially.

90

Greater than or equal to 26

High N credit. No additional fertilizer N needed.

Soil samples contain adequate available N for growing corn. No fertilizer N is needed

 

*This N credit applied only to corn.
 
Even though this test takes some time, effort and cost, the 2016 data again demonstrates the usefulness of PSNT as a cost saving tool for N management when done properly. Choosing the right fields and preparation work goes a long way towards realizing the full benefits of PSNT. For more information, see “Prep work for PSNT” by Michigan State University Extension.
 
Reducing synthetic N fertilizer applied to corn not only means considerable economic savings, but also environmental stewardship by minimizing N losses to the environment.
 

Trending Video

How Can We Grow More Food With Less Impact?

Video: How Can We Grow More Food With Less Impact?

For over two decades, Dr. Mitloehner has been at the forefront of research on how animal agriculture affects our air and our climate. With deep expertise in emissions and volatile organic compounds, his work initially focused on air quality in regions like California’s Central Valley—home to both the nation’s richest agricultural output and some of its poorest air quality.

In recent years, methane has taken center stage in climate discourse—not just scientifically, but politically. Once a topic reserved for technical discussions about manure management and feed efficiency, it has become a flashpoint in debates over sustainability, regulation, and even the legitimacy of livestock farming itself.

Dr. Frank Mitloehner, Professor and Air Quality Specialist with the CLEAR Center sits down with Associate Director for Communications at the CLEAR Center, Joe Proudman.