Farms.com Home   News

Studies Shed Light on Sea Level Rise Protection

Studies Shed Light on Sea Level Rise Protection

By Robert Nathan Gregory

Like sea levels, expenses related to flooding in communities and businesses along the Gulf Coast are rising.

One student spent last summer investigating ways to mitigate these costs while enhancing approaches to shoreline protection during her time in the Mississippi State University Extension Undergraduate Apprenticeship program. The program is targeted toward high-achieving undergraduates from across the country to give them firsthand experiences in research and extension to understand how research can be applied.

Camille Sicangco, a junior double majoring in botany and mathematics at the University of Florida, worked under the direction of MSU Extension instructor Renee Collini, who specializes in coastal climate resilience. She conducted cost-benefit analyses of living shorelines compared to traditional hardened shorelines.

Sicangco worked with personnel at Camp Wilkes in Biloxi to provide a customized cost-benefit analysis of the decision to implement a living shoreline rather than continually replacing a wooden bulkhead along the waterfront.

Camp Wilkes had a bulkhead installed to protect its 150-foot shoreline, but hurricane damage over time rendered it nonfunctional. The nonprofit organization had already worked with Eric Sparks, director of the MSU Coastal Marine Extension Program, to create a living shoreline. Sicangco conducted a cost-benefit analysis that covers a 60-year timeframe. It showed that the living shoreline will save the camp about $73,000.

“What we found was that living shorelines are more resilient and cost-beneficial than bulkheads,” Sicangco said. “Most of that comes from the fact that you do not have to conduct as much maintenance on living shorelines.”

The primary benefit of a living shoreline is its ability to grow higher as sea levels increase.

“Bulkheads are static,” Collini said. “They cannot move or grow taller. As sea levels come up, the water will overrun them, and they eventually need to be replaced because they wear out. Living shorelines involve natural elements, whether it is a marsh or oyster beds or things that mimic those that would naturally be there to keep the shoreline in place.

“Because they are made to be in this location, they do not wear out,” she added. “You do not have to replace them unless they sustain storm damage, which you would have to also do with a bulkhead. That is why we say living shorelines are a natural way to adapt to sea-level rise. When the sea changes, so does the shoreline.”

Another project Sicangco tackled was with the Jackson County Utility Authority (JCUA), which is planning to construct a new facility. She was tasked with identifying the merits of building a berm around it that would account for sea-level rise.

“We found that building a berm would be a beneficial investment,” she said. “I think the best thing is that we were able to provide them with information that made them confident in going that direction.”

Collini said these studies will be integrated into future Extension programming on sea-level rise resilience.

“This project represents a trend that we have been seeing over the past four to six years, which is that when we started this, people were not talking about sea level rise all that much, and when they were, it was sort of abstract,” she said. “Being able to put numbers to these adaptations is a big step forward.”

Source : msstate.edu

Trending Video

How to fix a leaking pond.

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.