Study: Mesophyll Conductance Doubles in Soybean Domestication, Providing Opportunity to be Enhanced Through Selective Breeding

Oct 29, 2024

In a new study conducted by the Realizing Increased Photosynthetic Efficiency (RIPE) project, researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign looked back in time at soybean growth and discovered that modern plants have increased mesophyll conductance. This means that carbon dioxide travels faster from inside the leaf to the carbon-fixing enzyme Rubisco and consequently increases photosynthesis without loss of additional water.

This discovery was recently published in Plant, Cell and Environment.

“We thought it would be really intriguing to look at some ancestral cultivars of soybean and compare them to a modern cultivar, this gives us an insight into whether there is natural variability to assist direct breeding selection for increased productivity and water-use efficiency” said Elena Pelech, a postdoctoral researcher in the Long Lab.

“I grew a high-yielding soybean cultivar called LD11 (Glycine max), which was bred here in the Midwest, and then I selected four ancestral cultivars (Glycine soja) discovered from the northeast provinces of China, the assumed area of domestication,” said Pelech.

This study involved growing both modern and ancestral soybeans from seeds in a greenhouse and measuring mesophyll conductance following shade-to-sun transitions using concurrent measurements of gas exchange and carbon isotope discrimination.

“The ancestors of domesticated soybean are a vining plant that would have escaped much shade compared today’s dense soybean canopies where shade-to-sun transitions are frequent, and the speed mesophyll conductance can increase following these transitions affects photosynthesis.”

Most published data have focused on steady-state conditions meaning the plants are kept under a steady light, temperature, or CO₂ condition. With the concurrent gas exchange and carbon isotope discrimination method, the researchers were able to change those conditions—specifically the light variable—to measure the dynamic response of the mesophyll conductance. The results led to the research team discovering that following shade-to-sun transitions, mesophyll conductance was a significant limitation to soybean photosynthesis, but mesophyll conductance for the modern cultivar was two times higher which corresponded to a substantial increase in photosynthesis and water-use efficiency.

“This data is telling a story,” said Pelech. “There is evidence that we have indirectly increased mesophyll conductance by a 2-fold, suggesting a strong limitation on photosynthesis which has decreased through selection and subsequent breeding.”

Now, armed with this knowledge, scientists can tap into the unexplored potential within soybean breeding to deliver further sustainable yield improvements without more water, a strategy among many to supplement breeding efforts to increase crop production on existing land for agriculture.

Source : illinois.edu

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.