Farms.com Home   News

Study Shows Cover Crops May Increase Yields Over Time

By Linda Geist
 
Farmers need more research showing cover crops increase yields, reduce erosion and add nutrients back to the soil in corn-soybean rotation before they adopt the practice, says University of Missouri researcher Ranjith Udawatta.
 
Few farmers in the Corn Belt, especially Missouri, have adopted the practice, says Udawatta, a research professor in soil, environmental and atmospheric sciences. He hopes his research and that of others encourages policymakers to consider cost-share programs with incentives to adopt the use of cover crops.
 
Udawatta and other researchers, including MU Extension agronomist Dhruba Dhakal, conducted a four-year study at a soil health demonstration farm in Chariton County in cooperation with the Chariton County Soil and Water Conservation District, Associated Electric Cooperative Inc. and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
 
The researchers used legume and non-legume cover crops on wheat-corn-soybean and corn-soybean rotations on claypan soils. They compared input costs and yields to analyze benefits.
 
Udawatta’s study included 2012 and 2013, which were marked by drought and poor growing conditions. In 2014, fields planted with cover crops showed an average 8 percent increase in corn yields compared to similar test fields not planted with cover crops. This resulted in a 30 percent increase in revenue per acre. However, a 37 percent increase in cost per acre offset that revenue. As a result, profits went down 33 percent.
 
In the next year, revenues and yields went up and researchers reduced input costs. Udawatta believes that revenues increase and costs decrease over time through use of cover crops.
 
Use of cover crops is important in Missouri, where row crop farming lacks diversity, Udawatta says. Farmers devote most of their acres to soybean, corn and wheat. The lack of diversity reduces soil productivity and increases pest and disease pressure. It also reduces weed control.
 
Most nutrient loss occurs when soils lie bare after harvest. Cover crops benefit the soil during fallow periods by adding nutrients and reducing erosion, Udawatta says.
 
Farmers’ acceptance of cover crops depends upon proven economic returns, he says. In a 2007 survey, more than half of the surveyed farmers said they would plant cover crops if a cost-sharing program were available.
 
Udawatta points to a 2013-14 cover crop survey conducted by USDA’s Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program and the Conservation Technology Information Center. The SARE survey reported data from more than 2,000 farmers. It showed that cover crops significantly increase yields in the first year of use. Yield increases for corn were 6.35 percent and soybean yields increased 7.95 percent.
 
Other members of the research team include Zhen Cai, Clark J. Gantzer, Shibu Jose and Larry Godsey. The study is through MU’s Center for Agroforestry, MU School of Natural Resources and Missouri Valley College Agri-Business.
 

Trending Video

How to fix a leaking pond.

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.