Sulfur, Potassium And Boron: Scouting For Common Nutrient Deficiencies In Alfalfa

Jun 02, 2017

By Nora Nolden

Early season scouting is imperative to good nutrient management in alfalfa. In Minnesota, the main nutrient concerns lie in sulfur, potassium and boron. Read on for tips on how to scout for and manage these common alfalfa deficiencies.

Sulfur

In Minnesota, sulfur deficiencies in alfalfa are found in two main areas: 1) sandy soils where sulfur tends to leach rapidly; or 2) soils with low organic matter content that have a limited capacity to mineralize sulfur. Scout for yellowing in the upper leaves and thin stands. The most susceptible areas of the field will be sandy soils with low organic matter and eroded knolls within in the field.

Potassium

Alfalfa has a higher need for potassium (K) than most other crops and is often grown on soils where K can be limited. Deficiencies are most often found in sandy and dry soils, but can show up in many different soil types. Potassium deficiencies can look similar to sulfur deficiencies, but the big different lies in upper vs. lower leaves. To identify K deficiency, look for yellow spots towards the edge of lower plant leaves. The difference occurs there because potassium is a mobile element, while sulfur is not.

Once you’ve confirmed a K deficiency, test your soil to determine application rates. Applications should take place in early spring. If you’re using high rates or high management situations, you can also split-apply between early spring and after the first cutting.

Boron

Boron deficiencies are most likely to show up in east-central and northeast Minnesota, and in dry soils. Look for chlorotic and stunted plants, especially in sandy areas of fields with low organic matter. Deficiencies sometimes cause development of multiple stems.

If you think you’ve spotted a deficiency, use a soil test to determine if you need to apply. Watch your rates and take care not to over-apply as too much can lead to poor germination of newly seeded fields or stand damage in established fields.

Source: umn.edu

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.