Farms.com Home   News

Update On Insect Pests - Two-spotted Spider Mites, Soybean Aphid, Potato Leafhopper, Western Bean Cutworm

By John Tooker

A handful of insect pests are active and here is a run-down of some of the issues.

Two-spotted spider mites

The extended period of dry weather that many parts of Pennsylvania have endured has led to some local outbreaks of two-spotted spider mite in soybeans, and occasionally corn. Spider mites become a almost yearly mid-summer problem when conditions get hot and dry. When mites are present and rain continues not to come, it is often time to act. While there are many insecticides available in corn or soybeans, few are labeled and effective against spider mites; the choices are limited to products containing chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, or bifenthrin. Unfortunately, spider-mite populations vary in their susceptibility to these toxins, particularly dimethoate and chlorpyrifos. Some populations are easily killed by these products whereas others are more difficult to manage. This variation has been recognized in some parts of the country for a while, but may also apply to Pennsylvania. In past years, we have heard of dimethoate applications in Southeastern PA that seemed to have no effect on two-spotted spider mites. We would be curious to hear from readers of other instances where they feel that these products were not effective, so please drop us an email or give us a call. If you encounter a population that does not respond to dimethoate, you will need to consider one of the two other effective products.

Potato leafhopper

Potato leafhopper populations have been large in some locations and damage to alfalfa fields (i.e., hopperburn) can be found without too much trouble. As a result, we have heard of many instances of growers protecting their fields with insecticides. Growers would be wise to continue to keep an eye on their fields in the coming weeks, particularly in fields that were recently cut and the crop is beginning to re-grow. Recall that potato leafhopper populations can be very spotty, so get out your sweep nets and scout those fields to check your local populations. The Penn State Extension potato leaf hopper factsheet provides more details on this pest, scouting protocols, and economic thresholds.

Soybean aphids

Soybean aphid is active in Pennsylvania soybean fields, but their numbers appear to be mostly low. In commercial fields in Centre and Union County, we are seeing small, scattered populations. These populations are insignificant and certainly not worth managing, but we have heard of much larger populations in New York. The economic threshold for soybean aphid is 250 aphids per plant across an entire field, so if populations do not reach this level, there is no need to control their populations. Nevertheless, farmers can get pressure from various people to manage even these small populations. A group of Extension entomologists in Northern states (including me!) recently collaborated to write a detailed article explaining the 250 aphid per plant threshold, how it relates to soybean and soybean aphid biology, and why treating below this level usually wastes time and resources. This article is currently posted on a University of Minnesota website.

Western Bean Cutworm

For the past seven years, Penn State has led an effort in the state to trap for Western bean cutworm, a pest of corn and dry beans. Fortunately for growers in Pennsylvania, populations of caterpillars have been very weak across most of the state (we have only found a handful), so we choose not to continue our trapping effort for the moths into 2016. Nevertheless, if you are a corn grower in the northern part of PA, we encourage you to scout your fields for this pest, and tune into pest updates from Ohio State and New York State IPM to learn about their populations and experience with this pest species.

Source:psu.edu
 


Trending Video

Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

Video: Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

A new peer reviewed study looks at the generally unrecognized risk of heat waves surpassing the threshold for enzyme damage in wheat.

Most studies that look at crop failure in the main food growing regions (breadbaskets of the planet) look at temperatures and droughts in the historical records to assess present day risk. Since the climate system has changed, these historical based risk analysis studies underestimate the present-day risks.

What this new research study does is generate an ensemble of plausible scenarios for the present climate in terms of temperatures and precipitation, and looks at how many of these plausible scenarios exceed the enzyme-breaking temperature of 32.8 C for wheat, and exceed the high stress yield reducing temperature of 27.8 C for wheat. Also, the study considers the possibility of a compounded failure with heat waves in both regions simultaneously, this greatly reducing global wheat supply and causing severe shortages.

Results show that the likelihood (risk) of wheat crop failure with a one-in-hundred likelihood in 1981 has in today’s climate become increased by 16x in the USA winter wheat crop (to one-in-six) and by 6x in northeast China (to one-in-sixteen).

The risks determined in this new paper are much greater than that obtained in previous work that determines risk by analyzing historical climate patterns.

Clearly, since the climate system is rapidly changing, we cannot assume stationarity and calculate risk probabilities like we did traditionally before.

We are essentially on a new planet, with a new climate regime, and have to understand that everything is different now.