Farms.com Home   News

USDA Rescinds Proposed Organic Animal-Welfare Rules; Small Producers Seek New Label

 
The U.S. Department of Agriculture tossed out a set of proposed changes this week that would have redefined living conditions for dairy and beef cattle, sheep, lamb, poultry and egg-laying chickens on certified organic farms.
 
Small organic farmers say they’re forced to compete with larger operations on an uneven playing field. And already, the Trump administration’s decision has pushed a group of smaller organic farmers to create their own organic label.
 
Te proposed rules, called the Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices, required organic farms to give animals, in particular chickens, more space and access to the outdoors. The rules also would have banned certain practices, such as debeaking birds and tail docking (i.e. shortening an animal’s tail).  
 
After 14 years of developing the regulations, the USDA said it doesn’t have the authority to enforce them; the changes were set to take effect in May.
 
In a 2017 report, the USDA estimates that up to half of U.S. organic egg producers would have dropped their certification due to the proposed regulations. That would have translated into fewer organic eggs, the USDA says, and cost consumers about $1.50 more a dozen.
 
Small organic farmers already can’t compete with larger operations who only meet the minimum requirements for organic, according to Francis Thicke, a small organic dairy farmer in Iowa.
 
Thicke, who also is a former member of the National Organic Standards Board, says his cows graze on pasture and have a diet of 85 percent grass, far beyond the USDA’s certified organic standard of 30 percent.
 
“It’s very unfair, I think, for small to midsize dairy farmers, who are meeting the spirit and letter of the law, are being forced out of the market,” Thicke says.  
 
He added that he’s part of a group of farmers who want to create a separate label aside from the official USDA organic one to reflect producers’ commitment to the treatment of animals.  Under the label, farmers would follow higher standards, including more grazing space for dairy cows and outdoors space for poultry.  
Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Sweetener Effects on Gut Health - Dr. Kwangwook Kim

Video: Sweetener Effects on Gut Health - Dr. Kwangwook Kim



In this episode of The Swine Nutrition Blackbelt Podcast, Dr. Kwangwook Kim, Assistant Professor at Michigan State University, discusses the use of non-nutritive sweeteners in nursery pig diets. He explains how sucralose and neotame influence feed intake, gut health, metabolism, and the frequency of diarrhea compared to antibiotics. The conversation highlights mechanisms beyond palatability, including hormone signaling and nutrient transport. Listen now on all major platforms!

“Receptors responsible for sweet taste are present not only in the mouth but also along the intestinal tract.”

Meet the guest: Dr. Kwangwook Kim / kwangwook-kim is an Assistant Professor at Michigan State University, specializing in swine nutrition and feed additives under disease challenge models. He earned his M.S. and Ph.D. in Animal Sciences from the University of California, Davis, where he focused on intestinal health and metabolic responses in pigs. His research evaluates alternatives to antibiotics, targeting gut health and performance in nursery pigs.