Farms.com Home   News

Canadian Agri-Food Policy Needs to Adapt to Less Friendly Trade Environment

The announcement of a Chinese anti-dumping probe into Canadian canola illustrates the rapid shift to a less friendly global trade environment – one that Canadian agri-food policy needs to quickly adapt, according to an Ontario-based economic research organization. 

An Independent Agri-Food Policy Note released Monday by Agri-Food Economic Systems contends the anti-dumping investigation is a clear indicator of a changing international trade policy environment, where Canadian agri-food is exposed. 

“Canada needs a rapid pivot to anticipate a future of adverse effects from large countries’ industrial policies, and a less friendly international trade environment, not readily contained by the rules-based system. But Canada still needs the rules-based system that shields smaller economies from geopolitical intimidation”, said Al Mussell, Agri-Food Economic Systems Research Lead and co-author of the paper.  

“We need a mixed strategy- with our own industrial policies, new trade alliances, but also supporting the system of trade rules we have now.” 

To help understand the context for China’s anti-dumping action on Canadian canola, the policy note reviews geopolitical developments, the essential components of the global rules-based trading system, and identifies where gaps have opened. 

Ted Bilyea, Agri-Food Economic Systems Research Associate and co-author of the paper, said it is likely that Canada will face more trade actions against agri-food in the future- and in relation to other matters that have little or nothing to do with agri-food. 

Source : Syngenta.ca

Trending Video

No-Till vs Tillage: Why Neighboring Fields Are World Apart

Video: No-Till vs Tillage: Why Neighboring Fields Are World Apart

“No-till means no yield.”

“No-till soils get too hard.”

But here’s the real story — straight from two fields, same soil, same region, totally different outcomes.

Ray Archuleta of Kiss the Ground and Common Ground Film lays it out simply:

Tillage is intrusive.

No-till can compact — but only when it’s missing living roots.

Cover crops are the difference-maker.

In one field:

No-till + covers ? dark soil, aggregates, biology, higher organic matter, fewer weeds.

In the other:

Heavy tillage + no covers ? starving soil, low diversity, more weeds, fragile structure.

The truth about compaction?

Living plants fix it.

Living roots leak carbon, build aggregates, feed microbes, and rebuild structure — something steel never can.

Ready to go deeper into the research behind no-till yields, rotations, and profitability?