Farms.com Home   News

Current Risk Report For Peanut White Mold (Stem Rot) Based On Soil Temperatures

By Rebecca L. Barocco
 
 
2012-05-30 09.43.03
 
Early season fungicide sprays can be helpful, however, it is important to assess your risk.
 
As soil temperatures are increasing, it is time for peanut growers in Florida, as well as many other areas of the southeast, to consider an early season white mold (a.k.a. stem rot) fungicide spray.  The possibility of low peanut prices in 2016 has led to a need for improved decision making when applying fungicides, which can be done through risk assessment.
 
One of the most important factors to consider in an early season white mold spray decision is the presence of the pathogen (Sclerotium rolfsii) in the field, which can be inferred from cropping history.  However, without the proper environment, the likelihood that disease will develop is severely hindered, making weather data an important component of fungicide spray decisions.  Using soil temperatures collected from various FAWN weather stations (Jay, Marianna, Quincy, Live Oak and Citra, FL), the disease risk levels from 5/9 to 5/11 are no/ low risk in Jay, Quincy, and Marianna, moderate in Citra, and moderate-high in Live Oak (Figure 1).  Last week, risk levels were high in Live Oak and Citra and moderate in Marianna, but the recent cold front brought down these risk levels by ‘cooling off’ soil temperatures across the state. Over the next week or so, we are expecting these risks to remain relatively the same as our current weather forecasts indicate air temperatures will remain relatively cool (< 90°F) for this period.
 
The risk levels shown here are based only on favorable soil temperatures for the fungal pathogen, however adequate soil moisture is also required for fungal growth.  When adding rainfall data to the risk model, disease risk levels drop to low/no risk for all areas reported.  However, irrigation practices should be considered when making management decisions about white mold.
 
 
Figure 1. Disease risk map for peanut white mold (stem rot) based on favorable soil temperatures for the fungal pathogen (Sclerotium rolfsii).
 
Figure 1. Disease risk map for peanut white mold (stem rot) based on favorable soil temperatures for the fungal pathogen (Sclerotium rolfsii).
 
The temperature risk model assumes the pathogen is present in your field, and all other environmental and culture conditions are conducive for the disease.  Thus, it is highly recommended that this information be used with the PeanutRx disease risk index to gain a better understanding about the effects of crop rotation, variety, row pattern and seeding rate on the disease.  PeanutRx is available for download as an application on Android and iOS devices.
 
A list of fungicides for white mold control is provided in Table 1 below. More information about PeanutRx and details on available fungicides can be found in the 2016 Peanut Update.
 

Table 1. Fungicides labeled for peanut white mold control

Always follow label instructions for proper product use, and rotate with different FRAC groups to help manage pathogen resistance.
Trade nameFRAC group codeActive ingredient
Common Fungicides
Folicur®, Tebuzol®, Orius®, Integral®, Muscle®, Tebustar®3tebuconazole
Quash®3metconazole
Proline®3prothioconazole
Provost®3tebuconazole + prothioconazole
Abound®, generic11azoxystrobin
Elatus®11 + 7azoxystrobin + solatenol
Fontelis®7penthiopyrad
Artisan®*7 + 3flutolanil + propiconazole*
Convoy®7flutolanil
Other Labeled Fungicides
Evito®11fluoxastrobin
Headline®11pyraclastrobin
Priaxor®11 + 7pyraclastrobin + fluxaproxad
Propiconazole should not be used if the peanuts will be shipped at any point to the EU.  See the article New Propiconazole Restrictions for 2016 Peanut Production by Michael Mulvaney for more information.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Trending Video

From Conventional to Regenerative: Will Groeneveld’s Journey Back to the Land

Video: From Conventional to Regenerative: Will Groeneveld’s Journey Back to the Land

"You realize you've got a pretty finite number of years to do this. If you ever want to try something new, you better do it."

That mindset helped Will Groeneveld take a bold turn on his Alberta grain farm. A lifelong farmer, Will had never heard of regenerative agriculture until 2018, when he attended a seminar by Kevin Elmy that shifted his worldview. What began as curiosity quickly turned into a deep exploration of how biology—not just chemistry—shapes the health of our soils, crops and ecosystems.

In this video, Will candidly reflects on his family’s farming history, how the operation evolved from a traditional mixed farm to grain-only, and how the desire to improve the land pushed him to invite livestock back into the rotation—without owning a single cow.

Today, through creative partnerships and a commitment to the five principles of regenerative agriculture, Will is reintroducing diversity, building soil health and extending living roots in the ground for as much of the year as possible. Whether it’s through intercropping, zero tillage (which he’s practiced since the 1980s) or managing forage for visiting cattle, Will’s approach is a testament to continuous learning and a willingness to challenge old norms.

Will is a participant in the Regenerative Agriculture Lab (RAL), a social innovation process bringing together producers, researchers, retailers and others to co-create a resilient regenerative agriculture system in Alberta. His story highlights both the potential and humility required to farm with nature, not against it.