Potassium Needs for Corn and Soybean: Could Soil Clay Type Play a Role?

Sep 24, 2021

By Dan Kaiser and Leanna Leverich

Potassium (K) is needed by all plants and potassium deficiencies can significantly reduce crop yield. While the chemistry of potassium in soils is relatively simple, K availability can be significantly impacted by environmental conditions. If soils are dry, K deficiencies can occur. Plant roots need water to efficiently draw K from the soil, which has been in short supply the last two years. But there are other things that can impact K availability as well.

Cation exchange capacity

Potassium is taken up by plants as the potassium anion (K+). Cation exchange capacity (CEC), or the soil’s ability to hold cations, including the K+ ion, can also impact K availability. The soil’s CEC is influenced by the abundance and type of clay present. Most of Minnesota’s soils are classified as “mixed” clay mineralogy, but most farmers’ fields are dominated by one clay type. Soils high in illite clays tend to have a low shrink-swell capacity and a lower CEC compared to soils high in smectite clays, which tend to shrink and swell. What is not known is how these clay types influence K availability in the soil.

Sandy soil

Sandy soils represent a separate challenge as sand itself has no CEC and many of the glacial outwash soils in Minnesota have very little clay giving most sandy soils a very low CEC. In fact, while the K+ ion is not particularly mobile in high clay soils, potassium can leach in sandy soils. This makes it much harder to rely on “leftover” K not used by the previous crop to be available for the following crop.

Potassium guidelines for corn and soybean

Recent research has shown that it takes less K to maximize corn and soybean yield in some sandy soils. This is part of the reason why we are currently re-evaluating the university’s potassium guidelines for corn and soybean.

Over the past three years, we have begun to look at how crops grown on different soil types respond to potassium. Funding from the Minnesota Corn Research and Promotion Council has made it possible for us to look further into clay mineralogy across the state. There are three key areas we are looking at in this project.

How does clay mineralogy vary across the state? More specifically, we are looking at how soil clays vary in their illite and smectite content, and whether this variation can be used to refine our potassium guidelines. In this process, we are also looking at CEC to determine what might be the best method for predicting crop K needs.
Why do we not find a large response to potassium in sandy soils that test low to very low in K? We are trying to determine whether K is being released through weathering of soil minerals and how changes in soil pH impact CEC, which could potentially affect soil K retention.
Should we update our potassium fertilizer rate recommendations and maintenance-based K guidelines? Once we know more about which soil properties impact K availability, we will re-evaluate current K fertilizer rate recommendations and suggested soil critical levels to be used for those interested in a maintenance-based K strategy.

Minnesota potassium mineralogy map

We currently need help to complete the first part of the study, which involves mapping soil K mineralogy in Minnesota. The map below shows where data has been collected and where soil samples have been taken but not yet sent in for analysis.

Map

We still need soil samples from these locations in Minnesota:

Southeast: Wabasha, Dodge, Houston, Rice, Le Sueur (north), Blue Earth, Nicollet
Southwest: Watonwan, Martin, Pipestone, Lyon (north), Redwood (northeast), Yellow Medicine (west)
West-central: Kandiyohi (north), Pope, Stearns (east)
Northwest: Traverse, Douglas, Todd, Otter Tail, Wadena, Becker, Wilkin, Clay, Norman, Mahnomen, Clearwater, Red Lake, Pennington, Marshall, Roseau, Kittson
East/Central: Wright, Anoka, Chisago, Mille Lacs, Kanabec, Washington, Eastern Hennepin

The goal of this study is to get at least one to two soil samples from each of the major agricultural areas of the state. We are still in need of soil samples from the majority of the Red River Valley as well as some locations in west-central Minnesota and the far southeastern and southwestern corners of the state.

Source : umn.edu

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.