Farms.com Home   News

Sale of Two Popular Landscape Plants Now Banned in PA

Sale of Two Popular Landscape Plants Now Banned in PA

By Lois Miklas

In fall of 2021 two popular landscape plants were added to the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture's list of noxious weeds: Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii)  and Callery, or 'Bradford', pear (Pyrus calleryana)  .  According to Pennsylvania law a noxious weed is "a plant that is determined to be injurious to public health, crops, livestock, agricultural land or other property."  Most plants on the noxious weed list are recognized nuisances (for example, Canada thistle, poison hemlock, and stiltgrass). However, Japanese barberry and Callery pear trees have long been promoted for residential and commercial landscaping. Their placement of the noxious weed list includes a phased plan for making their propagation and sale in Pennsylvania illegal.

Why is Japanese barberry a problem?

Known for its dark red foliage and deer resistance (due to thorns), this seemingly well-behaved shrub forms dense thickets in natural areas, crowding out diverse ecosystems of native plants. Japanese barberry has berries that many people do not even notice. Birds eat these berries and then disperse them in meadows, pastures, and woods. Japanese barberry also spreads when its branches touch the ground and root. Some research indicates that Japanese barberry harbors the black-legged tick, a major source of Lyme disease.

Why are Callery pear trees a problem?

The Callery pear was developed as a street tree in the mid-20th century; landscapers and residents embraced the trees' flush of white blossoms in spring, rounded canopy, and attractive fall color. Despite their pleasant appearance, they have proved to be very susceptible to wind damage. Like Japanese barberry, Callery pear trees originated in Asia and have escaped cultivation in North America, aggressively taking over natural areas. Birds and small mammals consume the small, hard pears—inedible to humans—and distribute the seeds.  The trees also spread through a shallow root system. 

What can residents do?

By fall of 2022, it will no longer be possible to purchase Japanese barberry or Callery pear trees in Pennsylvania. At this time residents are encouraged, but not required, to remove existing plants. Though sterile cultivars of Japanese barberry may be available soon, Master Gardeners recommend that residents choose native plants as replacements or additions to the landscape.

Native plants to replace Japanese barberry:

  • Ninebark (Physocarpus opulifolius) has burgundy foliage and peeling bark that adds winter interest.
  • Smooth hydrangea (Hydrangea arborescens) is a native version of the popular shrub.
  • Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica) sports cylindrical, aromatic spring blossoms and lovely fall color.
  • Inkberry (Ilex glabra) is a broadleaved evergreen in the holly family that has a hedgelike quality similar to Japanese barberry.

Native, spring-blooming, replacements for Callery pear:

  • Serviceberry (Amelanchier canadensis) has lovely, white spring blossoms and berries attractive to birds.
  • Redbud (Cercis canadensis) is known for its purple spring flowers; white cultivars are also available.  
  • Crabapple (Malus, spp.) Though both native and exotic varieties of crabapples are available, according to Doug Tallamy in Bringing Nature Home, natural hybridization has helped make most crabapples friendly to native wildlife.

 

Source : psu.edu

Trending Video

Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

Video: Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

A new peer reviewed study looks at the generally unrecognized risk of heat waves surpassing the threshold for enzyme damage in wheat.

Most studies that look at crop failure in the main food growing regions (breadbaskets of the planet) look at temperatures and droughts in the historical records to assess present day risk. Since the climate system has changed, these historical based risk analysis studies underestimate the present-day risks.

What this new research study does is generate an ensemble of plausible scenarios for the present climate in terms of temperatures and precipitation, and looks at how many of these plausible scenarios exceed the enzyme-breaking temperature of 32.8 C for wheat, and exceed the high stress yield reducing temperature of 27.8 C for wheat. Also, the study considers the possibility of a compounded failure with heat waves in both regions simultaneously, this greatly reducing global wheat supply and causing severe shortages.

Results show that the likelihood (risk) of wheat crop failure with a one-in-hundred likelihood in 1981 has in today’s climate become increased by 16x in the USA winter wheat crop (to one-in-six) and by 6x in northeast China (to one-in-sixteen).

The risks determined in this new paper are much greater than that obtained in previous work that determines risk by analyzing historical climate patterns.

Clearly, since the climate system is rapidly changing, we cannot assume stationarity and calculate risk probabilities like we did traditionally before.

We are essentially on a new planet, with a new climate regime, and have to understand that everything is different now.