Farms.com Home   News

Spring Wheat Harvest Still Ramping Up; Winter Wheat Harvest Nearing End

The US spring wheat harvest continued to ramp up this past week, while the winter wheat harvest is starting to wind down. 

According to Monday’s USDA crop progress report, 11% of the American spring wheat crop was in the bin as of Sunday, up 9 points on the week and head of 8% last year but behind the five-year average of 14%. Meanwhile, the winter wheat harvested gained 8 points from a week earlier to reach 87% complete as of Sunday, 2 points ahead of last year but I point behind average. 

The harvest in the No. 1 spring wheat state of North Dakota is still just getting underway, with 2% of the state crop in the bin as of Sunday, 5 points behind the average. At 13% complete, the Minnesota harvest advanced 12 points from the previous week but also remains behind the state average of 20%. On the other hand, the Montana harvest jumped 21 points on the week to 22% complete, 7 points ahead of the average. The South Dakota harvest remains the most advanced, with 38% of the crop off as of Sunday, versus 21% a week earlier and 46% on average. 

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

How to fix a leaking pond.

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.