First True Armyworm Outbreak in Wheat Since 2010

Jun 25, 2020

By Ricardo Costa and Christina DiFonzo

Some wheat growers in southern Michigan counties have experienced their first true armyworm outbreak since 2010. In the past few days, we have been contacted by several farmers in many Michigan counties complaining about true armyworm infestations in their wheat fields and asking what they could do about it.

While scouting one of these fields, we found about eight to 10 larvae per square foot—remember, the threshold is only two larvae. A significant number of them were around 1 inch long, which tells us they still could be eating for a few more days.

In some areas, the plants had all of their leaves eaten by the worms, but the heads, for the most part, were still there. Since the plants were already in the milk stage (Feekes 11.1) and because stripped plants can yield 50% to 60% of their undamaged potential yield, we concluded that the field should be sprayed. In her recent Fonz Facts newsletter, Michigan State University Extension entomologist Christina DiFonzo said a 50% yield potential may sound low. However, the average wheat yield in Michigan is around 80 bushels per acre, while the equivalent average yield is about half in western states like Kansas.

Wheat plants without leaves due to true armyworm feeding

The importance of regularly scouting your fields, not only for insects but also for weeds and plant diseases, can't be emphasized enough. Your goal is always to apply insecticides when larvae are above threshold levels, but before they cause most of the damage. When scouting, shake off the plants and look under the crop residue to find larvae. You can't exactly predict when an infestation will happen, but trapping for armyworms and other insects can help inform you where you can expect to see true armyworm activity in your area, giving you enough time to scout and control the pest before an outbreak happen.

True armyworm larvae laying on residue.

When spraying, one crucial thing to consider is the preharvest interval (PHI). DiFonzo states that insecticide choices on wheat have narrowed over the years, and the PHIs of the remaining products are long. Products such lambda-cyhalothrin (Warrior), gamma-cyhalothrin (Proaxis) and cyfluthrin (Baythroid, Tombstone) have a 30-day PHI while cypermethrin (Mustang, Fastac) has a 14-day PHI.

Source : msu.edu

Video: How to fix a leaking pond.

Does the pond leak? Ummmm....possibly a tiny bit. Well, more than a bit...ok, the darn thing leaks like a sieve!

QUESTIONS ANSWERED: Damit is not plastic. Therefore, there are no microplastics. I wish I had not mentioned plastic, but that is a very common polymer and I mentioned it as an example of a polymer. A polymer is simply a chain of repeating molecules, or "monomers." Cellulose is a polymer of glucose molecules. Starches are also polymers of various molecules such as fructose, maltose, etc. We have many polymers inside our bodies. In other words, just knowing something is a polymer doesn't make it bad, toxic, harmful, etc. However, this also doesn't mean all polymers are safe.

The specific polymer used for Damit is a trade secret, however, it has been closely scrutinized by multiple health and safety authorities. This includes the governmental authorities of Australia, the USA, Europe, and Asia. Not only have they determined that is safe to use in earthen ponds, and not harmful to fish, but it is considered safe to use in human potable water systems in all of these areas. And of course, they know the exact makeup of the polymer when making this determination. I'm told that the same polymer is in use by many municipalities to keep potable water storage tanks leak free. I can't tell you exactly what the polymer is, because I don't know, but given the confidence with which the governmental authorities have authorized its use, I would bet it is made of a monomer that we are exposed to all the time, like fructose or something.

It also breaks down in a matter of years, and does not accumulate in the environment. The end products of breaking down are CO2, water, and base minerals like potassium. The SDS reports no need for concern with ingestion, inhalation, or contact. If in eyes, rinse with water.

End result, can I say for sure that it is 100% safe? No, I don't know exactly what it is. But given people who do know exactly what it is, and have scrutinized it, have approved it for use in human potable water systems, I'm pretty comfortable putting it in an earthen pond.